Search for: "Michaels v. Superior Court"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,060
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Superior Court case -- November 8, 2011. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:37 am
Superior Court case — November 8, 2011. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 U.S. 464 (1981), and Buchanan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:42 pm
Superior Court case -- November 8, 2011. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:42 pm
Superior Court case — November 8, 2011. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm
Proskauer Rose or Ray v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm
By: Michael H. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:53 am
According to the decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, Michael Robinson had a number of disciplinary problems over a period of time. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Supreme Court and Gentry v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
– Superior Tribunal de Justiça decision in Ativa – Minolta battle (IP tango) Canada Sunrise for .xxx domains is now open (Canadian Trademark Blog) Wikileaks cables provide global insights on Intellectual Property issues (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) China Complaining about Taobao’s IPR complaint system and a MOU (IP Dragon) “VERTU” mobile phones vs. “VERTU” spectacles – Beijing First Intermediate… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
In Alves v 152-154 W. 131st St. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
Burbank Police Department et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case BC414602, Filed May 28, 2009. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:49 am
By Michael TarrantHazlett v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:50 pm
Superior Ct. 2005) in which Google sued an alleged click fraudster and won a $75k default judgment; and United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:19 am
” But not every court agrees; consider Saelzler v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Docket Report) District Court Minnesota: Res judicata bars patent claims that could have been asserted in earlier trademark case involving the ‘Same technology and the same accused products’: Superior Industries, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Spallas (collectively, plaintiffs) asserted claims against Fotouhi for violating the partnership agreement and filed a petition in the superior court to compel arbitration. [read post]
