Search for: "Miller v. State of New York"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Miller, Patrick J. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
Greg Stohr and Henry Goldman of Bloomberg News report on Harmon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
” A New York Times piece praised the Judge’s insistence on the primacy of fundamental rights in the face of technological change, and suggested that it was “too bad her separate opinion mustered no other votes”. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm
State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle just got some uncomforting news. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:40 am
This is an embarassing decision for the New York Attorney General's office, which blew a deadline and waived its right to a sure-fire challenge to an inmate's otherwise successful habeas corpus petition.The case is Stevens v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to strike the eighth affirmative defense alleging that the fees in question were excessive, without regard to the sufficiency of the defendant's opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Miller, Patrick J. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Although plaintiff did not pursue her cross appeal, plaintiff's counsel stated in an affirmation that the cross appeal involved a narrow issue that appellate counsel had indicated did not affect her fee. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
The two cases in which the Court heard arguments yesterday were Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm
Miller; Jackson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:27 am
According to Lloyd, since the passage of the Safe Harbor Act in New York—designating it the first state in the country to “protect, not prosecute children for an act of prostitution they couldn’t even legally consent to”—nine other states have passed Safe Harbor legislation. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
In addition, on Tuesday, the Court will hear oral arguments in Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:07 am
• At an 11:30 a.m. hearing, the New York Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider a bill that would increase the mandatory retirement age for state judges from 70 to 74. [read post]
