Search for: "Mills v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 2,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bay Mills Indian Community — immunity of Indian tribe to lawsuit for conducting gambling operations away from the reservation No. 12-138 — BG Group v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:55 am
The decision was sustained by a State Supreme Court justice [Manning v Sobol, August 7, 1995, not officially reported]. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:13 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
December 20, 2017) (putative collective and class action brought under federal and state wage and hour laws by plaintiffs who were employed to build a solar farm in Hope Mills, N.C., alleging defendants misclassified them as independent contractors, did not pay overtime compensation, made unlawful wage deductions and violated other wage and hour laws) TJF Services, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:13 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
December 20, 2017) (putative collective and class action brought under federal and state wage and hour laws by plaintiffs who were employed to build a solar farm in Hope Mills, N.C., alleging defendants misclassified them as independent contractors, did not pay overtime compensation, made unlawful wage deductions and violated other wage and hour laws) TJF Services, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
See, State ex rel. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Sir John Thomas stated that, following A-G v MGN [2011] EWHC 2074 (Admin), the test is whether “publication would have given rise to a seriously arguable ground of appeal if the trial had been allowed to continue and proceeded to conviction”. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
  The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports on David Mills, the young appellate lawyer who will argue on behalf of the petitioner, an Ohio woman who was sexually assaulted in a state prison. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 pm
He actually tried a felon in possession case -- United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Entry 50 of List II does not constitute an exception to the position of law laid down in M P V Sundararamier (supra). [read post]