Search for: "Minor v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 7,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm by Roger Parloff
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Act in 1917 in Wilson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[5] That may be especially true for minority religious communities' confidence in the secular judiciary, since many minority religions and denominations might have special reasons to distrust the majority's legal system.[6] To be sure, the plaintiff might understandably worry that those coreligionists will resent him for suing, and may shun him or refuse to do business with him. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:43 am by Ezra Rosser
The return of judicial discretion with the United Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In October 1945, during her second year at Columbia Law School, future United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall hired her as a law clerk. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Parental rights extend to the right to have children,[10] the right to “direct the upbringing and education” of their children,[11] and a right to family integrity.[12] In comparison, children in the United States are left with few rights: constitutional jurisprudence has denied children an affirmative constitutional right to an education[13] and health care.[14] Where Can Children Find the Right to Consent? [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling on the parties' motions for summary judgment in Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
The cases described in the text involve courts passing judgment on communities within the United States, usually based on affidavits by litigants coupled with conve [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
The SEC stated that “the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
That crime consists of an agreement to oppose by force the authority of the United States or to hinder the execution of federal law. [read post]