Search for: "Mitchell v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2010, 3:10 am by SHG
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 8:55 am by Shawn R. Dominy
In addition, Bryan Hawkins explained the issues, positions, and oral arguments in the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Barbara Moreno
Robert Statham, Jr., Colonial Constitutionalism: the tyranny of United States’ offshore territorial policy and relations (2002). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
On the first appeal below, HHJ Mitchell: said that the Guidance issued by the Secretary of State, to which local housing authorities are required by section 182 of the Act to have regard in the exercise of their functions relating to homelessness, indicates that authorities can use hostels. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
On the first appeal below, HHJ Mitchell: said that the Guidance issued by the Secretary of State, to which local housing authorities are required by section 182 of the Act to have regard in the exercise of their functions relating to homelessness, indicates that authorities can use hostels. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
In Mr J Mitchell v Royal Mail Group Ltd (England and Wales: Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2023] UKET 1805473/2022, Royal Mail Group applied to strike out the claim that Mr Mitchell’s dismissal had amounted to direct discrimination or harassment related to religion or belief. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 24 March 2014 Tugendhat J heard applications for third party disclosure in the linked “Plebgate” cases of Mitchell v News Group and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 4 March 2015 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the case of Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
Dennis, Contrivance and Collusion: The Corporate Origins of Shareholder Derivative Litigation in the United States, 67 Rutgers U. [read post]