Search for: "New York v. Class" Results 681 - 700 of 6,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Most New York employment lawyers will tell you that, unlike in many other states, there is no cause of action for wrongful termination for whistleblowers under New york common law. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:46 pm
The parties agreed that plaintiff must arbitrate the antitrust dispute, and plaintiff served defendants with a demand for class action arbitration in New York. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm by Epstein Becker Green
[1]Gregg Settembrino is a paralegal at Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. and a law student at New York Law School. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:16 am by Alex Talarides
Earlier this month, Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York issued his opinion certifying a class of buyers of the common stock of a company created by a Chinese reverse merger. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel Schwartz
Because, as the The New York Times suggests, each plaintiff is merely getting an amount per a formula, instead of showing specific damages:  In his opinion, Justice Scalia said it was unacceptable to allow employment discrimination lawsuits to proceed as huge class actions when monetary awards would be based on a broad formula per plaintiff, without having an individual assessment of how much each plaintiff had suffered. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:38 pm by Howard Wasserman
Reorienting diversity jurisdiction around racial bias (regardless of in- or out-of-state) offers a strong new argument against the complete-diversity requirement, as illustrated by New York Times v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:32 pm by Eric Goldman
I sent the following email to a reporter covering the fallout from General Mills’ amended legal terms to mandate arbitration and the The New York Times’ coverage, When ‘Liking’ a Brand Online Voids the Right to Sue (and see the murky follow-up): ____ Class action waivers are undergoing a renaissance following the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
 The three named plaintiffs, who reside in Michigan, New York, and New Jersey, also seek certification of subclasses of purchasers under those three states’ consumer protection laws. [read post]