Search for: "North v. Superior Court"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am
I’m aware of one case in which a North Carolina superior court judge found that the police had not been delegated the authority to trespass individuals from the grounds of an apartment complex. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:09 am
The NC Business Court's decision last month in Krawiec v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Canada In the case of Doe v D 2016 ONSC 541, the Ontario Superior Court expressly recognised the tort of “public disclosure of private facts”. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:42 pm
San Diego Superior Court Case No. #37-2011-00093816-CU-PA-CTLCase Name: MATTHEW THOMAS LONEY V. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:22 pm
I will keep that result posted in my results section of my website.For now, what is important about this injury case is that justice was served for the two brothers, and I will continue to fight the good fight for their sister.San Diego Superior Court Case No. #37-2014-00037223-CU-PA-NC [North County Division]Case Name: Raul Guzman, et. al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
North Coast Railroad Authority, S222472. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 12:01 pm
Judge McGuire came down pretty hard on a Florida attorney admitted pro hac vice (meaning "for this one particular occasion") by another Superior Court Judge, in McCarthy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 1:24 am
In the precedential case Doe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
The Supreme Court in Pascale v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
In felony cases tried in superior court, in which an indictment is necessary to give the superior court jurisdiction, the answer is not as clear. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
In felony cases tried in superior court, in which an indictment is necessary to give the superior court jurisdiction, the answer is not as clear. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
App. 16 (1985), the Court held that: [t]he scope of an arbitration award and its res judicata effect are matters for judicial determination; therefore, whether plaintiff's claims are barred was for the superior court to determine. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:13 am
McKale v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
Dine-A-Mate, Inc., 129 N.C.App. 773, 501 S.E.2d 353 (1998); Masterclean of North Carolina, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 10:20 am
Barba v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:18 am
– United States District Court – Western District of North Carolina – December 11th, 2015 – This is a negligence and loss of consortium case involving falling ice. [read post]
