Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
D., professor at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, expanded on the topic of oversight, explaining that the PCAOB has been blocked from doing inspections in China since its inception after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in the early 2000s. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
" And "Sarbanes-Oxley" didn't get mentioned at all. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:56 pm
Executive officers would be credited for any amount they reimburse an issuer pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the same compensation that would also be subject to the issuer’s clawback policy. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:16 am
I committed my crimes, simply because I could.If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.I do not own Overstock.com securities short or long. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 11:50 am
NOTE: As a matter of first impression in the Ninth Circuit, the Court addressed “[the] interplay between the reporting requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley and the scienter pleading requirements of the PSLRA. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
Scalia” all do a fine job during a breezy 90 minutes on the statutory question under Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 am
"sarbanes-oxley - http://sarbanes-oxley.pliggza.com/
Former San Bernardino County assistant assessor, Jim Erwin, is ...By bbvm "A widening criminal probe of the San Bernardino County assessor's office led to the arrest Thursday of James Erwin, chief of staff for county Supervisor Neil Derry and a former assistant assessor, on 10 felony counts including "failure to disclose ... [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
The court had this to say: In Sarbanes-Oxley, Congress crafted a provision that requires public company CEOs and CFOs to disgorge bonuses if there is a restatement because of material noncompliance. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Koss, its Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:56 pm
Section 105(c)(6) of the Sarbanes-Oxley authorizes the Board to impose sanctions on accounting firms and their supervisory personnel for failing reasonably to supervise associated persons who have violated certain laws, rules, or standards. [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:30 pm
[Pretty obvious, I think, but helpful to see a specific case on the subject. ] From the Iowa Supreme Court's opinion (written by Justice Dana Oxley) in Iowa Supreme Court Att'y Discip. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
The duty of good faith entails honest and fair dealing as directors and officers carry out day-to-day tasks for the benefit of the company. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:21 am
In reversing a First Circuit decision, the Supreme Court majority held that whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act cover employees of private contractors and even subcontractors that are hired by publicly traded companies. [read post]
10 May 2008, 11:55 am
Having one firm-wide project involving the entire staff builds office morale. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
FMR, 12-3, involves a First Circuit decision holding that the employee retaliation protections in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
Yates contends that section 1519, enacted as part of the ‘anti-shredding provision’ of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, was never intended to prohibit the destruction of non-documentary, non-informational items such as fish and thus did not apply to his alleged destruction of fish,” his petition says. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
Sec. 1519 was originally enacted in the wake of the Enron and Worldcom corporate scandals as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
In Sylvester, a case brought under the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), the ARB stated that “Rule 12 motions challenging the sufficiency of the pleadings are highly disfavored by the SOX regulations and highly impractical under the [OALJ] rules. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:32 am
In Sylvester, a case brought under the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), the ARB stated that “Rule 12 motions challenging the sufficiency of the pleadings are highly disfavored by the SOX regulations and highly impractical under the [OALJ] rules. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 7:24 pm
The continuing discussion of issues surrounding the question of how corporate directors and officers can best be protected from their liability exposures has at its root a continued concern based upon the Enron settlement. [read post]
