Search for: "Other Doe Entities 1-100" Results 681 - 700 of 2,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2021, 8:56 am by Kevin Kaufman
LB432 as amended would remove GILTI from Nebraska’s tax base by giving it the benefit of the state’s 100 percent dividends received deduction (DRD) beginning January 1, 2022. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:39 pm by Lucy Ricca, Graham Ambrose
Rhode Center on the Legal Profession (Sept 2022) at 18, Figure 1.In the long run, however, it’s all about the data. [read post]
Second, if a community air monitoring program does not comply with the Act, its data cannot be “used, disclosed, or disseminated” by LDEQ to: (1) Issu[e] a fine, penalty, or violation against any person, including the owner or operator of a stationary source [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 4:58 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  Skycom documents showed that Huawei also controlled the entity to which the company was sold in 2009 until at least 2014.[4] Gibb-Carsley said Relying on misrepresentations by Meng and other Huawei representatives, one of the banks and its U.S. subsidiary cleared more than $100 million worth of transactions concerning Skycom through the U.S. between 2010 and 2014.[5] HSBC had officials from Exiger, a monitor due to HSBC’s prior sanctions and anti-money… [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 4:58 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  Skycom documents showed that Huawei also controlled the entity to which the company was sold in 2009 until at least 2014.[4] Gibb-Carsley said Relying on misrepresentations by Meng and other Huawei representatives, one of the banks and its U.S. subsidiary cleared more than $100 million worth of transactions concerning Skycom through the U.S. between 2010 and 2014.[5] HSBC had officials from Exiger, a monitor due to HSBC’s prior sanctions and anti-money… [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:28 am by Stu Ellis
The limit being frequently discussed is $40,000, but how does that translate to crop insurance subsidies? [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by Robert Liles
An interest in which an individual or entity exercises operational or managerial control over, or directly or indirectly conducts, the day-to-day operations of another organization (including, for purposes of § 424.519 only, sole proprietorships), either under contract or through some other arrangement, regardless of whether or not the managing individual or entity is a W–2 employee of the organization. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by admin
An interest in which an individual or entity exercises operational or managerial control over, or directly or indirectly conducts, the day-to-day operations of another organization (including, for purposes of § 424.519 only, sole proprietorships), either under contract or through some other arrangement, regardless of whether or not the managing individual or entity is a W–2 employee of the organization. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
It does not state that a majority of the disinterested members is required, as the [plaintiffs] assert. [read post]
CBI ‘concerns or relates’ to trade secrets and almost any other information of commercial value, the disclosure of which can have the effect of causing ‘substantial harm’ to the ‘competitive position’ of the complainant (note 1 to the chapeau of Section B). [read post]
 The tax applies only to companies with at least $1 million in gross revenues from digital advertising services in Maryland and $100 million in global annual gross revenues. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:07 am by Adam Levitin
Such an entity could then rent space from the post office or other government entities, if the locations made sense. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
" In re Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Serial No. 79046106 (June 18, 2009) [precedential].The Marks: Toshiba argued that, while addition of a house mark to someone else's registered mark does not avoid likely confusion, the term VANTAGE is not a house mark but a product mark used in two other Toshiba marks. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
No such entity called SPH Medical exists in Arizona, according to corporate filings. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
CDA § 230(c)(1) immunizes search engines from most kinds of tort liability for publishing the third-party content of others, while CDA § 230(c)(2) protects their decisions to remove it. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
CDA § 230(c)(1) immunizes search engines from most kinds of tort liability for publishing the third-party content of others, while CDA § 230(c)(2) protects their decisions to remove it. [read post]