Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court"
Results 681 - 700
of 942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
SRVA petitioned for a writ of mandate, which was denied by the Inyo County Superior Court. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
In court filings, the office park association's attorneys said the clinic "brought unwanted attention to the other owners, greatly embarrassing and distressing them, the protests of anti-abortion picketers, who, among other things displayed large placards of terminated fetuses. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:02 pm
Today’s case (Legault v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:44 pm
Parks, 146 N.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Myrick v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am
In Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
The contract concept is summarized well in a jury instruction the appellate court in Irving v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Kantorowski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:21 pm
Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Peter McBrien gave "false and misleading testimony while under oath," won't admit to "the impropriety of his conduct" and is "likely" to commit "further misconduct," Examiner Andrew Blum wrote in a July 7 letter (.pdf) to commissioners. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 8:56 am
Picture by cliff1066 NEWS: Reportedly, Judge Louis Locascio (Superior Court in Freehold, N.J.) rulled in the case “Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in Knick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in Knick v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1355 (Cal. 1996); Craft v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
LUSTIG v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
Pursuant to a Court Order dated February 5, 2009, t [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
