Search for: "People v Bright" Results 681 - 700 of 1,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
The GC RoundtableAnother bright and sunny day in Manhattan saw the General Counsel of leading American companies discuss the key challenges and opportunities in IP law for their businesses. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
Very few people have any idea what the FCC regulations say about 911 caller ID. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Third, the drug itself has harmed people. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address the issue in Wurie and a similar case, People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:45 am by SHG
On the bright side, when Eugene Volokh made the decision to take his big win in the 9th Circuit in Obsidian Finance v, Cox and move the court to tweak the opinion around the edges because a sentence hurt his pro bono client’s feelings, it gave rise to a number of interesting discussions about the duties and obligations of counsel. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am by SHG
Florida, the follow-up case to Atkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
One thing is for sure, that people depicted in films may have a copyright interest allowing them to issue takedowns is an issue of significant interest to big media companies and intermediaries alike. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It's unattractive when compared with bright sparkly pharma names like Actavis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Solvay or Teva. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:17 am by Lorene Park
Two daycare workers who reported a coworker’s child abuse to the state were reprimanded and fired for purportedly violating the employer’s confidentiality policy and behaving unprofessionally (Norman v Bright Horizons Family Solutions, LLC). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:10 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  Many people claim that Gnall sets forth a new bright line standard that a 15 year marriage merits permanent alimony. [read post]