Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 681 - 700
of 23,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm
The Justices had tough questions for both sides Monday morning in Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 5:04 pm
In part: Many people, and I suspect quite a few of the justices,... [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Korematsu v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 2:44 pm
Slightly over 20 years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a self-initiated injunction by the Chief Justice of British Columbia to prevent picketing in front of the courthouses in British Columbia; B.C.G.E.U. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Adler) The WSJ’s Jess Bravin reports on an interview with recently retired Justice John Paul Stevens in which he defended his “most unpopular opinion” — Kelo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
(See Butz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Pazaratz’s decision in J.N. v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 3:51 am
In Cox v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:20 pm
I was going to mention this opinion regardless of the merits, if only because of the offhandedly humorous way that Justice O'Leary introduces the facts. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
The dissent (Justice Levy) says it is.No easy answer to this one. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
The only question I have is about a single line in Justice Snauffer's opinion, about the fraud/theft office. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Portillo claim that at the trial, the only evidence of this fact came from nonadmissible hearsay, when the warehouse manager testified at trial that these were the prices he saw when he looked up the dumbbells online.Resulting, today, in a 45-page opinion that an evidence professor would drool over, in which Justice Feuer thinks that the testimony was admissible nonhearsay for one reason, whereas Justice Segal believes that it is admissible nonhearsay for a different reason. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
(And it's not even shy about it.)The statute requires actual possession to establish guilty, but that's because the Legislature -- and I'm convinced that Justice Humes is correct here -- accidentally left out the word "or" when it amended the statute. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Comports with justice, too. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
But Justice Lui's opinion persuades me otherwise. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
Two recent cases illustrate the point.One of Breyer’s most notable majority opinions—Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
In the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
