Search for: "People v King" Results 681 - 700 of 2,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
City of Philadelphia—about if a city can choose not to contract with an adoption agency because that agency will not work with gay couples, and argues that the Supreme Court may upend protections for LGBTQ Americans by reframing religious liberty as an equality issue, allowing people with religious objections to serving, hiring, or marrying LGBTQ people the ability to do so. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The R (Bridges) v South Wales Police case A key test case on the use of FRS has been heard by the Administrative Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am by davidmginsberg
  As much as the West has been taught to think of Communist governments as a form of dictatorship which does not represent the people of the country and whose governance of the people is not pursuant to the will of the people, this is not true as a rule and is not true in China today or when after the Communists defeated the Nationalists (just as Fidel Castro came to power with the will of the people). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This post deals with a more mainstream IP topic, patent validity, which was the subject of the "Validity is king" breakout session. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 4:26 pm by The Farber Law Group
According to a report on KOMO News.com, the pedestrian v. train accident occurred at Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm by Cheryl Nyberg
Anderson, Aboriginal Title in the Canadian Legal System: The Story of Delgamuukw v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
On the eve of the Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:45 am by David G. Badertscher
Raj Rajaratnam, 10-462-cv FREE WITH REGISTRATIONSupreme Court, Kings County, Part 10Criminal Practice Presence of Screwdriver With Defendant's Fingerprints at Crime Scene, Though Circumstantial, Sufficient for Case to Proceed People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:51 pm
Ct. 846, 148 LE2d 838) (2001) (given that officers had probable cause to believe that the defendant had drugs in his home, it was reasonable to detain the defendant outside his home for two hours while the officers secured a search warrant); see generally King v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm by Nathan Dorn
” (Storing, v. 5, pg. 105) Governments, no matter how they claim to derive their legitimate powers, have a tendency to expand beyond their proper bounds at the expense of the people’s individual rights. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
Entick was critical of the King; he was suspected of having written documents so declaring which he hid in his home. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:03 pm
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court heard the case of the People, Respondent, v. [read post]