Search for: "People v. Adams" Results 681 - 700 of 2,235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak observes that “Judge Kavanaugh must have studied earlier confirmation hearings carefully, as he had absorbed all of their key lessons: Say nothing, say it at great length, and then say it again. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am by Florian Mueller
The U.S. district court will hold a trial in December, and the purpose of the injunction is to bar Huawei from leveraging two Chinese patent injunctions (granted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court) before Judge Orrick has the chance to adjudicate a related claim.Like in the court below, Quinn Emanuel, as counsel for Samsung, is defending the Microsoft v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
Consider the Supreme Court’s recent judgment in Groia v Law Society of Upper Canada 2018 SCC 27. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Hunter, "Towards Amalgamationist Governance: Governor Hutt and Contradictions in British Colonial Policy Regarding Aboriginal People in Western Australia"5. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court in its recent NIFLA v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
For The Progressive, Bill Blum takes note of the ways in which the Roberts court “has been hard on labor unions and the rights of working people,” culminating in last term’s decisions in Epic Systems v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
Brett Samuels reports at The Hill that “Capitol Police charged 74 people on Wednesday in connection with a protest in the Senate office building against … Kavanaugh. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
AFSCME, arguing that “compelling people to give money, by itself, is not a First Amendment problem but is rather akin to taxation. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Adams, University of Alberta Faculty of Law, has posted Judicial Agency and Anxiety Under the Canadian Bill of Rights: A Constitutional History of R v Drybones, which is forthcoming in National Journal of Constitutional Law (2018):The 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights and its case law appear as a footnote in Canadian constitutional history. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak observes in The New York Times that “there is every reason to think a Justice Kavanaugh would continue to press one of his old boss [Kennedy]’s signature projects: dismantling campaign finance laws that restrict the ability of people and groups to spend money to influence elections. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
How will we the people know? [read post]