Search for: "People v. Christian" Results 681 - 700 of 1,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The lawsuit is brought by the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, which is represented by the same conservative Christian legal nonprofit that represented plaintiffs in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In fact,the quiz was authentic and had been administered by a private Christian school in South Carolina. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control:  "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
That's a good rhetorical move if what's really going on is that liberals resist showing favor to polygamy because it's done by people they don't like: Christianity-motivated traditionalists. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Currently the company does not allow people who are under this age to create an account on the platform. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Christian G. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Respondent was not a member of the riding, but defined himself as a Christian activist. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’d love to hear what people who are more knowledgeable than I am on this question, whether as to Islam, Judaism, Christianity, or other traditions, have to say about this. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:32 pm by Lisa McElroy
  In Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:34 pm by Mark Movsesian
Judge Block reasoned that NY's rule was constitutional under McGowan v. [read post]