Search for: "People v. Gay" Results 681 - 700 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
"The American people have no reason in the world to think it's going to work just like the president paints it," said one of those backers, Senator Pete V. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm by David Schraub
But the example rang a bell for me, because I recalled a similar passage in Maryland’s gay marriage decision, Conaway v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Mark Kende
Hodges, 576 U.S. __ (2015), where Roberts wrote that gay people may celebrate the decision, but added derisively that the majority’s decision has “nothing to do with the Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Record on Appeal
Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion (by Circuit Judge Reinhardt) in Perry v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:20 am
Thankfully, we have a body of nine people who are not swayed by such base political leanings, right? [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm by Jason Mazzone
My initial reaction to the Ninth Circuit panel's decision today in Perry v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 11:58 am by Chase Strangio
Legislation Affecting LGBT Rights Across the Country | American Civil Liberties UnionLast updated 1/20/2021Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in America continue to face discrimination in their daily lives. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:11 am by admin
In 2003, several of the justices knew gay people, or were even friends with them. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]