Search for: "People v. Miranda" Results 681 - 700 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
(ipblog.ca) Federal Court upholds distinctive surname mark dispute between competing family businesses: Miranda Aluminium v Miranda Windows and Doors (Global IP Watch) China Patently speaking: Failure to heed IP in China can be costly (IP Frontline) Major breakthrough for Chinese companies in the patenting stakes (IAM) Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court hears arguments in Pepsi’s trade mark infringement and unfair competition case against… [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
As the appeal of the denial of his first habeas petition was pending at the 9th Circuit, Balbuena received permission in the district court to amend his petition, and he introduced a new argument: The detectives had violated Miranda v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:09 am
Have a "CI's warning" akin to a Miranda warning that lying informants are prosecuted? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 That means making decisions based not on preconceived notions about what seems to be a tough response to terror but rather upon what will actually enhance the security of this country and the safety of the American people. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
Justice Kagan has been named to TIME’s 2013 list of its one hundred most influential people in the world. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am by fjhinojosa
Ragosta, A Wall Between Secular Government and a Religious People, 26 Roger Williams U. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
In addition, he would interview people in line about why they were there and their impressions of the Court and the case to be argued. [read post]