Search for: "People v. Peters" Results 681 - 700 of 2,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2018, 8:21 am by Larry
Supreme Court decision called Riley v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Noteworthy: fewer people voted. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:02 am by Matthew Kahn
Before the argument, Peter Margulies previewed the argument. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
  Peter Margulies explored the merits of the government’s expected reliance on the president’s Article II power when it argues Trump v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Andrew Hamm
My habit of avoiding people was not that I was not sociably inclined, but it was a question of doing one thing or another. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Peter Thiel match-up [Jacob Gershman, WSJ] “Prosecutors Investigate Firms That Offer Plaintiffs Early Cash” [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Seventh Circuit: parents, not Starbucks, bore duty of protecting 3-year-old from harm resulting from playing on crowd-control stanchions [Roh v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the full audio of oral argument in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 7:18 am by William Ford
In the lead-up to oral arguments in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Peter Rasmussen looks at two Supreme Court cases involving the Security and Exchange Commission’s enforcement powers, Lucia v. [read post]