Search for: "People v. Phillips"
Results 681 - 700
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
As Jason Cowart reports in the current issue of The Pomerantz Monitor, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of 2010, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am
It looks like they would also do away with all the problems of the “threshold” requirement introduced by Phillips v Mirabella (the nature of the problem is laid out at paragraphs 19 to 27 of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Faulding). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
See our recent post on Lord Phillips’ lecture. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
District Judge George Caram Steeh's ruling that the government legally can require uninsured people to purchase coverage.The judge had denied the group's request for an injunction against a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:47 am
Phillip M. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am
Mr Mulcaire, who was sent to prison in January 2007 for intercepting the voicemail of eight people, had challenged the questions posed on behalf of Ms Phillips on the grounds that providing answers might incriminate him. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
Heat makes people crazy. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm
The case was Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
Supreme court changes fair comment defence in libel cases Guardian: Lord Phillips says that key test for defending libel cases should be changed to ‘honest comment’ in light of new technology Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 On appeal from the Court of Appeal [2009] EWCA Civ 1075 JUSTICES: Lord Phillips (President), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Sir John Dyson SCJ JUDGMENT The Supreme Court… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
PHILLIPS: Yes. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:03 am
PHILLIPS: Absolutely. [read post]
