Search for: "People v. Quicke" Results 681 - 700 of 2,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Heller, which I discuss below).My point was that, although I certainly understand why partisans would be quick to wrap themselves in the Constitution whenever they can, the rest of us should not go along with the scam. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:55 am by Brent Lorentz
  See Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm by Shea Denning
A quick review of criminal case law provides some support for that notion. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:24 am by Kevin
Justice Alito seems to have freed himself in time to write a quick concurrence. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
  Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:46 am by Dennis Kiker
  A quick Westlaw search turned up at least 80 cases in 2011 alone in which Rule 26(g) was referenced. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Impresa case shows that English courts will not be quick to infer serious harm in cases involving relatively limited circulation which involve parties who are foreign, even if the allegations are serious. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Chloe Crawford, Lexology: Pronouns and Gender Identity in the Workplace: on Forstater and Mackereth. [read post]