Search for: "People v. Stewart"
Results 681 - 700
of 902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 8:27 pm
“This is a very important decision not only for the Milwards, but for all people who develop diseases caused by exposure to toxic substances through no fault of their own,” said Allen Stewart, founder of Allen Stewart, P.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
Backstory: Campbell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm
The case is Shani Burnett v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
” And, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Stewart Baker analyzes the December oral argument in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Boggerty v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
Sukur Ali v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:17 am
Sometimes it's good to be a senior judge with life tenure.In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
They include People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Stewart, 399 S.E.2d 344, 346-47 (N.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
Stewart. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
(Stewart Baker) Julian Assange is writing a book — and expecting to make somewhere between $1 and $2 million from it. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:21 am
v=u0lPuN03b40 Dr. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
