Search for: "People v. Stone" Results 681 - 700 of 1,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
  Style guides aren’t written in stone We don’t have to do everything that the McGill guide or Canadian Style tells us to do *gasp*! [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’ He also said that ‘When people and companies use legal means to minimize their tax bills, that’s not corrupt or greedy or unfair, it’s playing by the rules. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am by Shawn Dominy
Whatever someone might think about qualified immunity, it is not written in stone. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Morrisons supermarket chain has been fined for breaking the law on how people’s personal information should be treated when sending marketing emails. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
On 5 November 2024, the Court of Appeal heard the appeal in Salman Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Monday 12 to Thursday 15 December 2022 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Aaronson (aka “Dominic Ford”) v Stones (aka “Mickey Taylor”) (QB-2021-001538). [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Int’l, Inc v eSpeed, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) ITC: Public version of initial determination issued in investigation regarding semiconductor chips (complaint by Rambus against ASUS, NVIDIA and others) (ITC 337 Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – If authentic, new email from Steve Jobs has indicated Apple and Microsoft could be preparing to challenge validity of open-source video codecs (ZDNet) MobileMedia -… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
 In the Huffington Post, Geoffrey Stone analyzes the decision and suggests that it runs contrary to the Court’s holding in Scales v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
The former party leaders argued that the change would modernise government records, making it easier and more secure for people to access public services. [read post]