Search for: "Perez v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2007, 2:26 pm
The couple, who had recently moved to the United States from Cuba, were found bound with tape and stabbed to death. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 4:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
The State does not argue harmless error but commendably acknowledges that Perez's probable testimony would have been important to the defendant's case. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 1:18 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Elstad', 'Seibert' Analyzed in Ruling That Two-Step Strategy Not Used in Post-'Miranda' Confession
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:58 pm
United States, No. 06-1340.Presumably next Monday the Supremes will announce the denial of Diaz's rehearing petition and Perez's cert petition. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:17 pm
Perez v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:33 am
United States, No. 06-9977. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
Perez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 179 F.3d 81, 90 n. 3 (3d Cir.1999); Pacheco de Perez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 179 F.3d 81, 90 n. 3 (3d Cir.1999); Pacheco de Perez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 3:13 am
Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825, 829 (6th Cir.2003) (en banc) (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:51 pm
Div. of Occupational & Prof'l Licensing, 240 F.3d 871, 876 (10th Cir.2001); see also Perez v. [read post]
