Search for: "Perry v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 2:27 pm
Perry, Judge Representing Appellant (Plaintiff/Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina N. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Perry. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:15 pm
SOURCE: HOUSTON COURT OF APPEALS - 01-10-01067-CV – 5/10/12 CASE STYLE: Michael Easton and Dawn Johnson Whatley, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Perry Lee Whatley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 3:37 am
United States" 294 U.S. 330 y "U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:46 am
Perry, Judge.Representing Appellant Morris (Plaintiff): Patrick G. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Midcounties Co-Operative Ltd, R (on the application of) v Tesco Stores Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 841 (29 July 2010) Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908 (29 July 2010) Aylott v Stockton- On- Tees Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 910 (29 July 2010) GR & Ors (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 871 (29 July 2010) W (Algeria) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 898 (29 July… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At JURIST, Eric Segall discusses Fisher in the context of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
A General Civil Restraint Order against issuing further IP claims - Is this the end of the Perry v Brundle saga? [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 6:18 am
In the case, Velez v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm
Perry Conference Room, Encina Hall, Second Floor, Stanford University. [read post]
