Search for: "Perry v. State of California"
Results 681 - 700
of 786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Perry blocked the video transmission of the “Proposition 8” trial over gay marriage in California. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
[JURIST] The US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] on Wednesday heard closing arguments [transcript] in Perry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:05 am
Yesterday in federal district court in San Francisco, Judge Vaugh Walker heard closing arguments in Perry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
Today will be the closing arguments in the Federal challenge to California's Proposition 8. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm
All the states except Virginia and Maine are supporting the appeal. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm
Until now, she has, by virtue of her brief tenure as Solicitor General, defended the constitutionality of California's referendum outlawing gay marriage in the Perry v Schwarzenneger case.She really had no choice but to join that momentous fight on the side of upholding the California ban on gay marriage. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Because the majority concluded that the lower court acted in haste, and neglected federal law, and because the Court is not subject to Federal Judicial Conference rules, the Court’s decision blocking broadcasts in Perry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
Perry v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
Perry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
Walker's chambers have pretty much got to be the hottest judicial clerkship available in the entire state of California right now. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:15 pm
Perry v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
Sixteen states banned interracial marriage when the court struck that down in Loving v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
There are essentially four possible outcomes in the San Francisco marriage case (Perry v. [read post]
