Search for: "Petition of Thomas" Results 681 - 700 of 4,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2021, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
Ruggles opposed the petitions and left without signing them. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:32 pm by Josh Blackman
Last term, Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have granted review in the long-running Arlene's Flowers case. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch indicated that they would have voted to grant the petition; perhaps they are trying to dislodge the additional votes necessary to win rehearing. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:08 am by jlucivero
  In August 2018, Philip Barnett was released on bail while his habeas petition based on new exculpatory DNA evidence was pending. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm by Amy Howe
” In the case of Arkansas inmate Mickey Thomas, Sotomayor similarly conceded that “Thomas’ claim does not satisfy this Court’s traditional criteria for granting” review. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 1:57 pm by Andrew Hamm
These and other petitions of the week are below: Byrd v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
[Here’s an amicus brief our UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic just filed, on behalf of the Cato Institute.] [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court do not presently seem to agree – Berisha’s petition for the Court to overrule the “actual malice” requirement has been rejected, leading to Thomas and Gorsuch’s dissents. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:09 pm by Jon Sands
Davis, No. 18-99009 (9-10-21)(Thomas w/Graber & Clifton). [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
They raised issues in their petitions that, if true, could win their freedom. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes the allegations: Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited for sex trafficking and manipulated into providing to a third-party sex trafficker pornographic videos (“the Videos”) of themselves through the social media platform Snapchat. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thus, Gaddis, as a matter of law, cannot demonstrate that Lannom lacked probable cause to file the petition for stalking no contact order against him. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 10:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Stout disputed Felix's factual account in the dependency petitions. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
I strongly suspect the Sacketts will file a petition for certiorari, urging the Court to bring greater clarity  and concreteness to CWA regulation that Justice Kennedy's "significant nexus" test provides. [read post]