Search for: "Price v. State Bar" Results 681 - 700 of 2,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2013, 3:00 am by Administrator
Whether offered as the regular cover charge or offered only as a special charge to “jump the line”, the dispute here focuses on the charging of a lower price for women in order to enter the bar… The Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 2013, the Court of Appeals in Wisconsin in Habush v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Paul, 373 U.S. 132 (1963) (a non-FDA case involving agricultural pricing)). [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
"On the importance of technical innovation relative to design, I like the following passage from the brief:"To state the obvious, the investment in research and development for information and communication technologies—currently estimated at $250 billion annually—extends well beyond design to include the hardware, software, and services that are incorporated into the technological products. [...] [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit made such employer lawsuits more difficult in that circuit by issuing its en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Category: Infringement    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitleLifescan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
  Another New York state statute, Section 901(b) of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (“NYCPLR”), bars statutory damages under NYGBL in class actions in New York state court. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Michael Lowe
This means that the individual prosecutor is vulnerable to being disciplined by the State Bar of Texas for prosecutorial misconduct involving holding back evidence. [read post]