Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
In Steginsky v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
By Brian VillaIn Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
Currently there are 500 charging stations in the United States and 400 of them are in California. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Desta v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Curry v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
In WIT Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
Nemier v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Capstone Capital, LLC, a container of men's apparel shipped to the United States went unclaimed by the buyer due to the lack of financing. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
United States that non-systematic negligence by police officers fall within the scope of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued another blow to patent-eligible subject matter in the United States, ruling that naturally occurring DNA elements are not eligible for patenting. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
United States, 549 U.S. 457 (2007). [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
Briefly: At Balkinization, Zach Price weighs in on Puerto Rico v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:49 am
§3583(h) in a case of first impression In United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:11 pm
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3026779 “The United States federal judiciary maintains a system called PACER, “Public Access to Court Electronic Records. [read post]
Allegations That Designer Wedding Dress Line Constitutes A Relevant Product Market Found Implausible
30 Dec 2014, 10:36 am
House of Brides subsequently brought an action in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, for violations of the Sherman Act, and state antitrust and unfair competition laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 12:00 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
