Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 681 - 700
of 843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 7:21 am
” While the Treasury was facing a huge file of refund claims, based upon the prior appeals court ruling overturning the exclusion of residents, the Internal Revenue Service on March 2, 2010, decided not to go on contesting the refund claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Prior to the acquisition, the Canadian company had in place a policy prohibiting bribes and required its employees to sign a code of conduct. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The Court also routinely denied another case in which the Justice Department had declined to respond — the case of New Jersey Peace Action, et al., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:22 am
Washington Department of Social And Health Services, Case No. 07-2-895-5 (Thuston County, WA), on December 20, 2010. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Lu, as president, was in charge of management and the service department. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Regulations The United States Department of Treasury held a public hearing on February 23, 2010 focused on proposed new regulations for Internal Revenue Code section 104(a)(2). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
Interior Department. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am
http://tinyurl.com/2a93gv4 (Robert Unterberger) International eDiscovery, Sanctions, Ethics and US-UK Comparisons at Georgetown - http://tinyurl.com/25yj3gt (Chris Dale) Keyword Searches not Good Enough for eDiscovery, Experts Say - http://tinyurl.com/232mkh9 (Cindy Waxer) Lateral Moves, Court Rulings Spotlight E-Discovery - http://tinyurl.com/2ffcjwc (Gina Passarella) Legislators, Regulators Consider 'Do Not Track' Mechanism - http://tinyurl.com/2d28p3m (Lora Bentley) Moody v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:35 am
Alabama Department of Revenue (No. 09-520), a case involving a federal statute that prohibits states from imposing a tax that “discriminates against a rail carrier. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
” McIntyre v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
More than 450 e-commerce websites and retailers have partnered with Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty to employ aggressive sales tactics against their online customers splitting the revenue about 50-50. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:04 am
Also illustrative is the trial court’s ruling in Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:42 pm
See Dep’t of Revenue of Montana v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
– essay by Adam Mossoff (271 Patent Blog) NPEs are a problem for a minority, not the majority (IAM) US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit reverses Commission claim construction and finds claim obvious over prior art: Lucky Litter LLC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
