Search for: "Prior v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 48,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 6:49 am by Daily Record Staff
Prior to his jury trial, appellant decided to discharge his attorney and proceed without counsel. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:21 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to include evidence — Prior sexual activity A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County found Kenneth Albert Wartman, III (“Appellant”) guilty of three counts of sexual abuse of a minor, two counts of second-degree rape, two counts of incest, five counts of second-degree assault, one count of second-degree ... [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:44 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Prior convictions Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Lamont Anthony Vaughn, appellant, was convicted of home invasion, robbery, second-degree assault, first-degree burglary, third-degree burglary, theft of goods valued between $100 and $1,500, conspiracy to commit home invasion, and conspiracy to commit ... [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:39 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Prior bad acts Appellant, Dominick Daniel Hursey (“Hursey”), was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County with (1) two counts of first-degree murder; (2) two counts of first-degree assault; (3) two counts of the use of a firearm in a violent crime; and, (4) carrying and ... [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Mere presence Following a two-day jury trial in May 2016 before the Circuit Court for Charles County, appellant Ronald Davis was convicted of possession of a regulated firearm with a prior disqualifying conviction. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 8:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to introduce evidence — Victim’s prior sexual conduct Appellant, Gerald W. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The more I participate in discussions on the constitutionality of the individual mandate, the more it feels to me like a replay of the debate over the limits of federal commerce clause power prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm by Zachary Price
’”  Mangling a quote from a prior decision upholding Section 5, South Carolina v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Amanda Traphagan
The United States Supreme Court recently decided Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]