Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
The court’s description of the facts and developments below goes on to explain that onor around June 4, 2014, Doe was arrested in connection with a fraud investigation conducted by the Nevada DMV and the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The 2017 travel ban's nexus with national security and foreign affairs was a significant feature of the opinion of Chief Justice Roberts for the court in Hawaii. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 1:57 pm
., [09/25] US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In DOT v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In DOT v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
Justice Thomas’s statement, while the voice of only one Supreme Court justice, is especially concerning in light of President Trump’s aspiration to “open up the libel laws,” which seems to be aimed at overruling Sullivan. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:07 am
Jaclyn Frankfurt of the Public Defender Service, counsel for Robertson, began by arguing that Watson was bringing charges as a private citizen, in violation of the Constitution. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
See Wilson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am
Department of Commerce scrambled to renegotiate a new "Privacy Shield," consisting of a new set of privacy promises from the private and public sector. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:18 pm
Finally, the court noted that a "more recent" pronouncement by the Department of Justice reached the contrary conclusion. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
Lee v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
In Vaughn v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:55 am
” The social media posts, therefore, did not meet the threshold requirement established by Pickering v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In Windsor, by contrast, although the Department of Justice agreed with the district court’s decision to issue a judgment against the defendant, the United States, requiring it to pay damages to the plaintiff, it then appealed from that judgment on behalf of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Department of Public Health, 440 Mass. 309, 798 N. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Canada-Cameroon BIT signing; photo from DFATD In Hupacasath First Nation v. [read post]
