Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 725
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2008, 7:57 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
For example, if the applicant abandons an application more that one year after the first public use or sale in the United States or the first publication of the invention, all rights to the invention in the United States are effectively abandoned because the application cannot be refiled. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
See Query, 745 N.E.2d at 771. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:45 pm
The district court granted summary judgment for MassHousing, United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
When de facto, the government's conduct and comments amount to an invitation to depart upwards, EDNY Judge Irizarry reiterates in a recent decision, holding that the government breached a plea agreement by disclosing highly inflammatory information about the defendant in its sentencing memorandum to the court.Adding to a spate of recent decisions yielding divergent views of the propriety of the government's conduct in plea bargaining and sentencing (see here, here and here),… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
David Baker, chair of Baker Robbins & Co., provides better queries for a healthier, more productive conversation. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:00 am
Canadian Robert V. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:06 am
* Jazz Photo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
He would have been there while still an employee of the taxpayers of the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:47 pm
Integra (Scripps v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and their families. [read post]
