Search for: "READE v. KING" Results 681 - 700 of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Bill
When we read Mapp v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
When one starts to read a case, and the plaintiff is pro-se, look out for common mistakes within. [read post]
12 May 2007, 4:17 am
Best Shakespeare piece I've read on Shakespeare in some months is Barabara Everett on the romances, in the London Review of Books (link). [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hager v Inner Circle Logistics, Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 33395(U), September 28, 2023, Supreme Court, Kings CountyDocket Number: Index No. 525941/2022, Judge: Reginald A. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:41 am by Chijioke Okorie
In Milestone Beverage CC and Others v The Scotch Whisky Association and Other briefly discussed on the IPKat’s Africa IP Highlights 2020 and in greater detail on the Africa Roundup 2020 (free to read) on the Journal of IP Law and Practice (JIPLP), South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the arguments of the Scotch Whisky Association and interdicted the applicants from selling products, namely ROYAL DOUGLAS and KING ARTHUR, purporting to be whisky or… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:24 am by David Markus
King’s “On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft” in a faculty reading group. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:42 am
"] July 19, 2023 - 1 PM: TF Intellectual Property Pty Ltd v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant’s conclusory allegations that plaintiff law firm failed to prepare for trial and gather evidence in her matrimonial action do not state a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Barbara King Family Trust v Voluto Ventures LLC, 46 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2007]; see generally Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985] [attorney’s “selection of one of among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice”]). [read post]