Search for: "REED v. UNITED STATES"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,068
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
This case is especially important in Texas and other states within the Fifth Circuit because it overruled a previous holding in Reed v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
This is a new innovation in the United States, with only a few cases like Rio Props. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.Section 2. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
In a 2011 letter to Hillary Clinton, United States Senator Orrin Hatch opposed the Fund’s pro generic drugs procurement policy. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:57 pm
The FDCA leaves that to only the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
, asked the IPKat's old friend Steve Getzoff (Reed Smith LLP). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
This post is by the Reed Smith part of the blog only. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:28 pm
(United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, August 7, 2012) A surprise in Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:13 am
Grubbs moved to dismiss the claims against him, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
Hurricane Sandy left a swath of major damage and destruction over a large area of the Northeastern United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Parliament had given the Ministers permission to deal with a future situation where patients became entrapped in medium-secure units as they had been in the State Hospital, and a discretion to go further, to deal with other kinds of unit, if it ever became desirable. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:16 pm
(United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, August 7, 2012) A surprise in Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924). [read post]
