Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 681 - 700
of 9,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
Exactly 92 years after the infamous Buck v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
EMA or United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
United States, holding that the federal government needs a warrant to access cellphone location records. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Roberts of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the United States, and Peter B. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 pm
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:12 am
United States (08-192) . [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
” The statute would therefore outlaw the sale in the United States of a bullfighting video produced in Spain (since bullfighting is not legal in the United States), the sale of any hunting video or magazine in the District of Columbia (since no hunting is allowed in the District) or the sale of a crossbow hunting video or magazine in the many states which allow hunting with compound bows but not with crossbows. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas declined to certify a class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
True law nerds know that we all get to kick off every new year with the annual end-of-year report from the Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
United States largely avoids the big constitutional issue that was the original focus of the case: the scope of the treaty power. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, applying the reasoning in its own decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:49 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:55 pm
Robert J. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 1:59 pm
United State comes full circle.] [read post]
