Search for: "ROBERTS v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 17,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
(discussing displacement of Native American tribes); id. at 2483-85 (Roberts, J., dissenting)(same); Johnson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
If it were not for Kentucky Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
Sponsored Topics: Supreme Court - Voting Rights Act - United States - John Roberts - Government [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 11:13 am
In Gertz v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
On February 25, 2015 the Supreme Court heard oral argument inNorth Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:14 am
US (opinion) and Oregon v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Roberts could have tried to limit the effects of this decision by sticking to a set of fundamentally textual arguments about the meaning of the term “established by the state” in the context of the statute as a whole. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court released an opinion in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
Roberts, Jr., dissented, joined by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 opinion on April 27, 2020 in the case Georgia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
United States being overruled. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts asked today whether Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:06 am
State standing was the central issue in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:12 pm
” State enforced segregation was wrong, but so was state enforced integration in certain spheres of private relations. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
Alito drafted the dissent and was joined by Thomas, Scalia, and Roberts. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm
In Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:52 am
As a practical matter, the case merely extends the Heller status quo to the states and seems unlikely to change the realities of gun regulation. [read post]
