Search for: "Re v. PERS"
Results 681 - 700
of 7,383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 8:14 am
In a recent blog, we covered the pivotal decision in Javier v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
He took senior status this year.Judge Thomas came close to a nomination for the Supreme Court: President Obama interviewed him in 2010 (but chose now-Justice Elena Kagan).The most important antitrust decision he authored was the 2020 per curiam in the NCAA case (In Re NCAA Athletic Grant-in-Aid Cap Antitrust Litig.) that the Supreme Court affirmed last year under the caption of National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Here's Justice Gorsuch giving voice to that view earlier this year in his concurrence in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 8:06 am
Dist. of California, 495 F.3d 1062, 1065 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The onus is squarely on a party seeking a derogation from open justice to satisfy the court that such a derogation is necessary for the administration of justice and to protect his or her legitimate interests (as per CPR 39.2), a matter to be decided by carrying out the Re S balancing exercise: Gallagher at [5(vii)]. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
On Oct. 5, the Fifth Circuit held in Texas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am
If you guilty of violating one of California’s laws mentioned above, this may be considered negligence per se, and you can be presumed negligent. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The court’s approach is to apply the familiar balancing exercise described in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593; see, e.g., Re Al Maktoum (Reporting Restrictions Order) [2020] EWHC 702 (Fam); [2020] EMLR 17. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
The situation has been described by some as a “ticking time bomb,” in that it has provided ISIS and its supporters with yet another convenient narrative against Western states—“see, even when you are their citizens, if you’re a Muslim they will abandon you”—and has also increased the likelihood that these women may be further indoctrinated in these camps where they are surrounded by fellow former ISIS supporters, or grow resentful toward their state… [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Luedecke, 2008 ONCA 716, 93 O.R. (3d) 89, at paras. 53‑56, relying in particular on Rabey, at p. 519, per Ritchie J., and at p. 545, per Dickson J., as he then was, dissenting but not on this point). [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:00 am
Whether proportionality is a "subsidiary" defense or whether your failure to bring a compulsory-licensing action goes into a Sisvel v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
The minimum assessment is $250 per licensed location. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:45 pm
., which happens all the time and was one of 271 typos and similar errors in last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 1:12 pm
We’re watching for administrative agency guidance and FAQs, and will update you as soon as any issue. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm
They're just storefronts, not HTML5/OpenGL games. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 8:54 am
In 2013, in the case of Kuhnau v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:56 am
The 2020 Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The specification expressly states that “an effective dose … can be from … about 480 mg to about 720 mg per day. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
The latest lesson comes in Yeshiva University v. [read post]
