Search for: "Reach v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 37,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
In a 5-3 decision, the Texas Supreme Court yesterday in State of Texas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:26 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
Morse (LC)O’Reilly v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:53 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
LaVoice v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:34 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:33 am
In Williams v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"If the court finds that the determination is supported by a rational basis, it must sustain the determination even if the court concludes that it would have reached a different result than the one reached by the agency" (Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d at 431). [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"If the court finds that the determination is supported by a rational basis, it must sustain the determination even if the court concludes that it would have reached a different result than the one reached by the agency" (Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d at 431). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:24 am
Slip op. at 16-17 n.9 (discussing Barr v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, involves whether private operators of public access channels are state actors subject to constitutional liability under the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:34 am
In the two years since the Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
