Search for: "Reagan v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
In January 2014, our client underwent a stem-cell transplant at the UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
See, e.g., Poe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:49 am
He won Bush v Gore and Citizens United. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Elven Joe SwisherUnited States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
December means: The Supremes are comin' to Town..SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIAORAL ARGUMENT CALENDARLOS ANGELES SESSIONDECEMBER 2, 2014The following cases are placed upon the calendar of the Supreme Court for hearing at its courtroom in the Ronald Reagan State Office Building, 300 South Spring Street, Third Floor, North Tower,Los Angeles, California on December 2, 2014.TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 20149:00 A.M.(1) S214679 State Department of Public Health v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm
Related Issues: PrivacyNSA SpyingRelated Cases: First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:53 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Wisconsin’s case—Wolf v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
These laws are a holdover of the Reagan-era "War on Drugs," and some states and municipalities have called for a repeal of these laws, as they are harsh, do little to curb drug crimes and are often applied inequitably. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
“[I]n such case it is the law of [the state where the mortal blow is given] that is violated, and not the law of the state where death may happen to occur” (Stout v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:35 am
Vermont North Properties v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 4:16 am
For a similar case, see United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:36 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
States have been scrapping that rule, and in Rogers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2014). [read post]
