Search for: "Reed v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Supreme Court struck down a key enforcement provision of the Voting Rights Act (the “Act”) in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:05 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Tuesday held oral arguments in Braidwood Management v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
In John Doe #1 v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm
The case is Joe Formicola v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
Unclear how far the Court had gone, and remains unclear; Court hasn’t taken a commercial speech case since then, though it has had Reed v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 1:23 pm
’” Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am
The prosecution appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 24 February 2015 by Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:31 am
Beatie v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
The Tenth Circuit held that, whether viewed as compelled speech or as a content-based restriction, the restriction had to – and did – satisfy strict scrutiny: Colorado could show that it has a compelling interest, and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest (Reed v Town of Gilbert 576 US 155, 164 (2015)). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:51 pm
Reed does not state that he has such personal knowledge. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:37 am
Judge Reed O’Connor’s ruling in favor of the plaintiffs was temporary, not final. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Becerra 16-1146 Issues: (1) Whether a determination that a law is content-based leaves room for a court to apply something less than strict scrutiny, specifically (a) whether the court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:44 pm
Texas v. [read post]
