Search for: "Regents of the University of California" Results 681 - 700 of 1,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2012, 8:49 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:29 am by John Quinn
Regents of the University of California), which effectively means the Administration cannot end DACA on March 5. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am by Kalvis Golde
Regents of the University of California, 5-4) Struck down a Louisiana law that required doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California,” a challenge to the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program, which allowed immigrants brought to this country illegally as children to apply for protection from deportation, “arrives during the heat of the presidential campaign next spring—no matter whether Mr Trump wins or loses the case—the question of immigrant rights will stoke an already fiery debate over the status of non-citizens… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 8:14 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California, in which the court held that the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program violated the procedural requirements prescribed for administrative agencies, “represents a troubling missed opportunity for the Court to confront the evidence that DACA’s rescission was motivated, at least in part, by unconstitutional racial animus. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:25 pm
That is the case growing out of the Enron financial debacle, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:45 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Recall that one of the key affirmative action precedents is Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
It's our great pleasure to welcome Jennifer Moore (left) as an IntLawGrrls contributor.Jenny is Regents Professor of Law at the University of New Mexico School of Law in Albuquerque. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Derek T. Muller
” Six of those top ten (Ave Maria, Regent, Faulkner, LSU, Idaho, Mississippi College) make the list of the least politically engaged faculty.So there are varying things to consider. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Derek T. Muller
” Six of those top ten (Ave Maria, Regent, Faulkner, LSU, Idaho, Mississippi College) make the list of the least politically engaged faculty.So there are varying things to consider. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
Strawbridge urged the justices to overrule Grutter and Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479, 51 Cal.3d 120 (1990). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:57 am by Dan Filler
THOMAS 44.10% 156 NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY 43.83% 157 SOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL 43.83% 158 CALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW 43.82% 159 PHOENIX SCHOOL OF LAW 43.65% 160 ATLANTA'S JOHN MARSHALL LAW SHOOL 43.50% 161 NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY 43.26% [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120 (Cal. 1990) The Boyds from Boyd v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376 (Laurel Heights) [holding the University wrongly piecemealed the environmental review of the relocation of its pharmacy school]: We hold that an EIR must include an analysis of the environmental effects of future expansion or other action if: (1) it is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the initial project; and (2) the future expansion or action will be significant in that it will likely change the… [read post]