Search for: "Research in Motion Ltd"
Results 681 - 697
of 697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2007, 8:58 am
On legal research and drafting, one example is the work we do for motion picture and television studios. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 4:59 am
See Sandt Tech., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
Scientific Research Funding Group, 189 F.3d 1327, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
It only had Daubert motions before it. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:06 am
("Roxane"), filed a motion requesting the court to recall the earlier opinion and substitute a redacted version which would omit historical net profit information as being "proprietary" and "highly confidential". [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:50 am
There must be some fairly annoyed people roaming round Alicante today following the publication in the Curia website of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling on OHIM's appeal in Case C-273/05 P, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Celltech R&D Ltd. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:49 pm
The site includes a "crack team" of bloggers who provide BlackBerry news, rumors, tips, reviews and celebrity sightings of the mobile device sold by Research In Motion Ltd. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 7:42 am
In an update to an earlier post regarding the suit by Research in Motion Ltd. against Samsung Electronics Co. with respect to Samsung’s mark BlackJack, the parties have apparently reached a deal. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 10:42 pm
It was announced on Thursday that Research in Motion Ltd. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 7:15 am
Research In Motion Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Back in early 2006 Mr Justice Pumfrey upheld the patent revocation claim brought by BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion Ltd (RIM) against Inpro & T-Mobile (see BAILII [2006] EWHC 70 Pat ). [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.: Greater Research Protection for Drug Manufacturers, DJCLPP:See Lawrence Ebert, One Response to Merck v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
" This case suggests that because the 271(e)(1) research exemption is an affirmative defense, 271(e)(1) can never be the basis for a motion to dismiss. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 9:32 am
Nipper at 11:32 AMAccording to this story: Former [Canadian] prime minister Brian Mulroney tried to contact an American cabinet secretary [then-U.S. commerce secretary Don Evans] on behalf of Research In Motion Ltd. [read post]
1 May 2006, 9:38 am
As seen on online.wsj.com: "Research In Motion Ltd. has been hit with another patent-infringement suit that seeks to halt sales of its popular BlackBerry email devices in the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 11:58 pm
Supreme Court will not hear the case of Research in Motion Ltd (RIM), the inventors and makers of the famous (and perhaps infamous) Blackberry, versus patent trolls NTP Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2005, 3:47 pm
Spencer [JTBF profile] of the Eastern District of Virginia [official website] Wednesday rejected the disputed settlement pact between the maker of the Blackberry [product website] communications device, Research in Motion Ltd. [read post]
