Search for: "Roberts, et al v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
– Justice Otto Moore of the Colorado Supreme Court, 1956 In this day and age of near constant, twenty-four hour news coverage, accessible through numerous television outlets (to wit, CNN, CSPAN, Fox News, MSNB, et al.), as well as through the more recent medium of internet distribution, access to the inner-workings of our government, on both the state and federal levels, is at an all-time high. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
.” What is potentially so significant about the argument that Washington attorney Robert A. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46)   New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office)   South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP)   Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46)   Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
ET, Robert Ambrogi will be hosting a panel on Online Dispute Resolution for the Massachusetts Bar Association. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
“In the United States, Escherichia coli O157:H7 causes ≈73,000 infections and 60 deaths annually (1). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
These expensive and potentially efficiency-reducing measures are not installed in the United States (though here there are other more “standard” precautions). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
Karen Bradshaw & Challie Facemire et al., Animals in the Courtroom, 32 Journal of Law and Policy 1 (2024) Law centers on the experience of the human species. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]