Search for: "Ross v. Day" Results 681 - 700 of 875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Rinehart, The big business of college game day, 12 TEXAS REVIEW OF ENTERTAINMENT & SPORTS LAW 1 (2010)Marc Charmatz, Lindy L. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm by Michael Froomkin
Without knowing the size of the settlement one can’t say whether it may serve some deterrent function in the future, but I have to wonder if it was large enough to achieve that.Incidentally, the note attached to the check says there’s a second, separate lawsuit,, Ross v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:45 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Then, just one day later - on October 28, 2011 - another group of plaintiffs filed a tag-along gender discrimination class action against Wal-Mart in Texas entitled Odle, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:15 am
I don't even usually wear necklaces with v-neck tees, but this one is a great fit. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:55 am by emagraken
 Madam Justice Ross refused to do so noting that the offer was ‘nominal’ and that it was not unreasonable for the Plaintiff to have her day in court. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Should these two developed lots be subdivided in the future, their owners will need to obtain a coastal development permit…” Deane Earl Ross v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
One of the standout briefs he refers to throughout the book is that of now-Chief Justice John Roberts in Alaska v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" Attachment: Brief: Windsor v United States Amicus NY State [read post]