Search for: "S B Mart Inc" Results 681 - 700 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 2:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The bribery related securities suit against Wal-Mart Stores settled for $160 million. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 am by Susan Schneider
Two are participating in the Program by distance education, helping us to develop our use of the University’s new video conferencing capabilities. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 9:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Citizens Overseas With Foreign Retirement Plans, Dual Citizenship Tax Issues New EEOC State Discrimination Charge Data Helpful Employer Risk Assessment Tool Discrimination Exposures Grow IRS Changing Individual Taxpayer ID Number Application Requirements Insurer Group Health Inc. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Dec. 19, 2008)Absence of 50(b) motion in the trial court deprives Appeals Court of ability to consider AT&T's appeal from J* for EEOC on its religion (Jehovah's Witnesses)/failure-to-accommodate, discharge discrim suitDC Circuit* Adams v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 30 S.W.3d 455, 463 (Tex. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:01 am by Greg Mersol
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act expressly incorporates much of the FLSA’s enforcement procedure, including the section 16(b) requirement that similarly situated claimants actually opt in. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bexis
  We think cy pres could be the Lexecon (that is the Lexecon, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As class action lawyers assert claims on behalf of employees continue to branch into new vistas in the brave new world of class actions after Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
O'Neill's well-argued dissent deserves far greater public attention than it has so far received. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Plaintiffs also contend that the motion judge erred in applying N.J.R.E. 804(b)(6), and in discounting their expert report as a "net opinion. [read post]