Search for: "SANDS v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> NRDC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
Given this view of the law and the evidence, it’s hardly surprising that the Bartlett jury, applying only state law, told the FDA to pound sand and decided that an FDA-approved drug simply shouldn’t be sold at all. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Walker In California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
At the hearing, Ticketogo's solicitor stated that the true number of licensees was actually over 60 companies. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Found., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
Indiana v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
Is this case, Cave v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
Seminole Rock & Sand Co. should be overruled; and (2) whether, in affording deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation that conflicts with the governing statute, regulations adopted through rulemaking, and decades of prior agency guidance, the Seventh Circuit’s decision conflicts with this Court’s decisions in Auer and Christopher v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Case Number: 15-cv-00269 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) Date Filed: January 21, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 3, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-143 In the Matter of Sands Brothers Asset Management, LLC, Steven Sands, Martin Sands, and Christopher Kelly Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16223 Date Filed: November 19, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 19, 2015 12/23/2015 … [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Why not draw a line in the sand against such wasteful regulation? [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 9:22 am
The #2 slot belongs to a case whose name comprises a mouthful: Stop the Beach Renourishment Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Doster, 23-154Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:48 pm
We affirm and remand for trial.NFP civil opinions today (2): Duneland Sand Inc., et al v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 11:26 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:03 am
In Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v I.P. [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:54 pm
In Abrasic 90 Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:01 am
To meet the high threshold of this intent, genocidal intent must be the only reasonable inference that can be made from the pattern of the state’s actions, according to the international court in Prosecutor v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
