Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH"
Results 681 - 700
of 16,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2023, 6:16 am
The Court of Appeals reverses and this case will go to trial along with the sexual and racial harassment claims that the Court of Appeals also revived, as discussed here.The case is Zeng v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
Smith, 70 F.4th 198 (June 6, 2023). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Liebig v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 21/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard 12th January… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:05 pm
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff was subjected to enough obnoxious, sexist, and racist comments that she can prevail at trial.The case is Zeng v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
A v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:28 am
In Koon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
While Huawei v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
