Search for: "SPENCER v. SPENCER" Results 681 - 700 of 1,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the Affordable Care… [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am by Jon Gelman
MAY 13, 2013  Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh The undersigned parties are committed to the goal of a safe and sustainable Bangladeshi ReadyMade Garment ("RMG") industry in which no worker needs to fear fires, building collapses, or  other accidents that could be prevented with reasonable health and safety measures. [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am by Ritika Singh
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:27 am
AETN had been granted permission to conduct witness-gathering evidence before the ruling in Marks & Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here], which requires the court, at an interim stage, to conduct a critical analysis of whether such evidence will be valuable to a determination of the issues and justifies the costs involved. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
Frank Johns, Catherine Seal, Spencer Crona, Mary Joy Quinn, Howard S. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:20 pm by National Indian Law Library
Spencer (prisoner rights, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:In re Morris (Indian Child Welfare Act, notice) In re D.L and K.L. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:57 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent decision in the Pennsylvania Federal Middle District case of Vaskas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am by NL
The best way that David Cameron could protect the severely disabled is to drop its appeal to the Supreme Court and amend the Regulations accordingly.Mike Spencer Legal Officer, Child Poverty Action Group(1) Reg 5 HB (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (SI No.3040), which inserts new regs 12BA, A13 and B13 into the HB Regulations 2006 (2) Burnip, Trengove, Gorry v SSWP [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (3) DWP, under Regulation 11(2)(b) of the Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit… [read post]