Search for: "STATE v. CLEMENTS" Results 681 - 700 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In response, policyholders have argued (with varying degrees of success from state to state) that public policy concerns are the properly left to the legislative branch. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am by Leslie Griffin
Those Catholic women’s interests, not the Sisters’, should tip the scale toward the government in Zubik v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC will argue first, representing the 26 states challenging the Medicaid provisions. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:23 am by Eugene Volokh
As Article V of the Constitution says, the Amendments “shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
– Ministers Clement and Moore’s speeches at Digital Economy conference (Excess Copyright) Michael Geist’s appearance at Industry Committee discussing Bill C-27 (Michael Geist) Maybe the jury didn’t like the songs - Legality of file-sharing in Canada and comparison with US position (Slaw) Liberal Party recommends ratification of WIPO internet treaties (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Canadian Press on attempts to establish a Canadian Pirate Party… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Hence, as Justice O'Connor put it in her concurrence in McCreary County, Ky. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm by Carter Ruml
Clement Attlee, Nov. 1945 (Archives Canada via Wikimedia Commons) Its detractors might see the bill as a reprise of Wickard v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]