Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD"
Results 681 - 700
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 2:02 pm
Co. d/b/a The Post and Courier v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Pink Floyd - "The Trial" ("The evidence before the court is incontrovertible / There's no need for the jury to retire / In all my years of judging I have never heard before / Of someone more deserving the full penalty of law. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Tambry and Suzanne were the lead plaintiffs in our case, Young v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:17 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Tokai v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:41 am
Justice Frankfurter put it in 1952 in Leland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
Floyd J had found that the patent as it stood was invalid. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
The lesson being if you are going to die, die in Indiana.Raskopf cited the case of CMG Worldwide v The Upper Deck Co., Inc case where he acted for the defendant. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
On 14 December 2010 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Pink Floyd Music Limited v EMI Records ([2010] EWCA Civ 1429) – a contractual dispute concerning downloading of music to iTunes. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Talking of Mr Justice Arnold, that very same judge drew the Kats' attention to a recent Patents Court for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Floyd in Daiichi Sankyo v Comptroller of Patents in which Novartis was not allowed to join this case as a party in order to participate in its reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:42 am
United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
On Wednesday Mr Justice Floyd handed down his keenly-awaited ruling in Football Dataco Ltd, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Scottish Football League Limited and PA Sport UK Limited v Sportradar GmbH & and Sportradar AG [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch), a sharply-contested battle that took place in the genteel surroundings of the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
The high court rejected Wiggins’ constitutional challenges, citing its earlier decision this year in Hollie v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
The fact that a steel-rollered Evolution machine, so long as it remains steel-rollered, does not infringe and is capable of lawful use as a complete machine in that state is irrelevant. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:02 am
One noteable feature of last week's oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:22 am
Winfrey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:19 am
Boccardo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:28 pm
Hauppauge asked State Supreme Court Justice Floyd to dismiss it from the law suit, contending that (a) the physician alleged to have touched the student was “an independent contractor and not an employee of the school district” and that (b) the district “had no knowledge of any prior sexual propensities” of the physician.Justice Floyd said that a school district, like any other employer, may be held vicariously liable under the doctrine of… [read post]
